◆ Finance
Aave allowed to transfer $71 million in ETH after North Korea hack
Policy**ShareShare this articleCopy link
Judge clears path for Aave to move $71 million in ETH linked to North Korea hack
Judge Margaret Garnett allowed frozen exploit funds on Arbitrum to move to Aave, but the legal freeze follows the assets as terrorism plaintiffs continue their claim.
By Sam Reynolds|Edited by Nikhilesh De May 9, 2026, 4:16 a.m. 2 min readMake preferred on
What to know:
- A Manhattan federal judge has allowed Aave to proceed with its recovery plan for $71 million in ether tied to a North Korea-linked exploit, permitting the funds to be moved off Arbitrum while for the moment preserving terrorism victims’ legal claims.
- Judge Margaret Garnett’s order modifies a prior freeze so Arbitrum governance can vote onchain to transfer the ETH to an Aave-controlled wallet and shields participants in that vote from liability under the restraining notice.
- The ruling is part of a broader push by terrorism judgment creditors to seize North Korea-linked crypto assets, including a separate lawsuit targeting Railgun DAO and Digital Currency Group over allegedly facilitating the movement of DPRK-controlled funds.
A Manhattan federal judge has cleared the way for Aave’s recovery effort to move forward after last month’s North Korea-linked rsETH exploit, allowing $71 million in frozen ether to be transferred out of Arbitrum while preserving North Korean terrorism victims’ legal claim on the funds.
In a two-page order published late Friday U.S. time, Judge Margaret Garnett modified a restraining notice previously served on Arbitrum DAO to allow an onchain governance vote transferring the immobilized ETH to a wallet controlled by Aave LLC.
The order also shields participants from liability under the notice, stating that anyone who initiates, votes on or participates in the transfer would not violate the freeze.
Judge Garnett's ruling follows an earlier off-chain Snapshot temperature check in which Arbitrum delegates overwhelmingly signaled support for returning the frozen ETH as part of Aave’s broader recovery plan. Any actual transfer, however, still requires a separate binding onchain governance vote.
The ruling resolves an immediate standoff that had threatened to derail a coordinated DeFi recovery effort after attorney Charles Gerstein, representing families holding roughly $877 million in unpaid terrorism judgments against North Korea, argued the frozen ETH could be seized because the exploit has been widely attributed to Lazarus Group, which is supported by Pyongyang.
Beyond the Arbitrum dispute**
Gerstein’s move against Arbitrum fits into a broader legal strategy to pursue North Korean-linked assets as they surface on decentralized finance (DeFi) infrastructure.
In a separate January lawsuit, many of the same terrorism judgment creditors that went after Arbitrum sued Railgun DAO, alleging the privacy protocol allowed North Korean actors to move funds that should have been frozen and made available to creditors.
At the time, the plaintiffs claimed North Korean hackers used Railgun to launder funds from prior cyberattacks, including the $1.5 billion Bybit exploit, and argued the protocol should have frozen those assets rather than allowing them to move onward.
Once DPRK-controlled wallets were moving funds through the protocol, those assets became potential targets for collection, they argued.
In March, they asked a Washington federal court clerk to enter default against Railgun DAO after alleging the protocol failed to respond to the complaint despite being served. Their complaint also names Digital Currency Group, alleging the crypto investment firm’s $10 million purchase of Railgun governance tokens in 2022 made it a participant in the DAO’s governance and economics.
And in February, the plaintiffs moved to secure USDT that the U.S. government had sought to seize through a forfeiture motion.
Ethereum NewsMore For You
Senate Banking Committee plans to hold key market structure hearing on Thursday
By Nikhilesh De|Edited by Jesse Hamilton5 hours agoThe Senate Banking Committee announced it would hold its markup hearing for the Clarity Act on March 14.
What to know:
- The Senate Banking Committee said it would hold its markup hearing for the Clarity Act on Thursday, May 14.
- The market structure bill had been in limbo since January, with issues like stablecoin yield holding up the bill's advancement. Lawmakers seem ready to move on with a compromise brokered by...
Read full storyLatest Crypto News
Senate Banking Committee plans to hold key market structure hearing on Thursday
5 hours ago
Coinbase rebounds as altcoins surge with bitcoin holding above $80,000
7 hours ago
AI agents fueled a frenzy of startup building at the Consensus Miami EasyA hackathon
9 hours ago
SEC chair Atkins signals new rules for onchain markets, AI-driven finance
9 hours ago
Kraken parent goes for the OCC charter in bid to become a federal crypto bank
11 hours ago
ECB's Lagarde’s digital euro warning: Why Europe shouldn’t just copy the U.S. stablecoin model
12 hours agoTop Stories
U.S. added 115K jobs in April, nearly doubling expectations
15 hours ago
AI agents could solve crypto’s user problem
22 hours ago
Bitcoin shows 2-cent price on Revolut as users report apparent BTC display glitch
18 hours ago
Arbitrum delegates back $71 Million ETH recovery plan despite U.S. seizure fight
19 hours ago