‘Mr. Nelson, Did You Kill People?’ Review: Shinya Tsukamoto Directs a Bizarre Misfire About a Black Soldier in Vietnam

Shinya Tsukamoto's latest directorial effort, "Mr. Nelson, Did You Kill People?", presented at the Venice Film Festival, has been met with significant criticism. The film, which centers on a Black soldier in Vietnam, is described as a bizarre misfire, failing to connect with audiences or critics due to a combination of narrative and technical shortcomings.

The review highlights several key issues that contribute to the film's perceived failure. Stilted dialogue is cited as a major impediment to engagement, hindering the development of characters and the progression of the plot. This is compounded by an oppressive sound design, which reportedly creates an uncomfortable and alienating viewing experience. Furthermore, the film's approach to its subject matter is characterized as a "gawking cultural gaze," suggesting a superficial or exploitative examination of the soldier's experiences and the broader context of the Vietnam War. These elements combine to make "Mr. Nelson, Did You Kill People?" one of the most unpleasant films to emerge from this year's competition.

The critical reception suggests a significant departure from the director's previous work, which has often been lauded for its distinctive style and thematic depth. The film's inability to effectively convey its intended message or engage viewers on an emotional or intellectual level marks it as a notable misstep in Tsukamoto's filmography. The specific focus on a Black soldier in Vietnam, a complex and sensitive historical period, appears to have been handled with a lack of nuance and insight, leading to a disappointing outcome.

The film's presentation at Venice, a prestigious platform for cinematic premieres, underscores the disappointment felt by critics who may have anticipated a more compelling or insightful work from the acclaimed director. The overall assessment points to a film that struggles with its narrative ambition, technical execution, and cultural sensitivity, ultimately resulting in a viewing experience that is more off-putting than impactful.